Ayodhya : Lull prevails over Ayodhya - the epicenter of India’s historic verdict- after the Supreme Court, on 9 Nov, ruled on the country’s oldest land dispute case involving Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board and Nirmohi Akkara.
Post the judgment, the city witnessed no major celebrations on protest of any kind. The court verdict favoured building of temple at the site. However the majority community in Ayodhya, put up no revelry in the regard. Similarly, the verdict the minority community though disappointed, chose to acknowledge the ruling without venting discontent in any form.
On the day of verdict, Saturday, heavy security arrangements, including prohibitory orders were in place at Ayodhya, and Faizabad.
Thorough inspections were carried out on vehicles coming from outside these cities. The ones appearing dubious were asked to return. Most shops in Faizabad remained closed on the verdict day.
In contrast, the shops in Ayodhya stayed open. Also, it was business as usual for towns of Devkali, Sahabganj, Subash Nagar and other prominent locations in the state.
However devotees to pilgrimage spots like Hanumangani, were rather scanty, owing to security reasons. Ghats including Nayaghat and Jankighat remained rather barren. However temple Artis at dusk, were carried out as usual.
Visits to temporary shrine in Babri Masjid courtyard was prohibited since Friday.
Police Stop Fireworks
Though people attempted to light crackers at few places, to rejoice the verdict, cops were quick to stop them in the act. Police also nabbed youths biking through streets raising Jai Sree Ram slogans .
Police and CRPF’s Rapid Action Force continue to maintain security dominance in Ayodhya and Faizabad.
Ahead of Ayodhya verdict, the district magistrate Anuj Jha had stated that the cities was prepared for any situation that might arise.
Meanwhile, in the wake of the verdict, the business community including retailers and small shopkeepers are optimistic on Ayodhya’s economy boost, in terms of increased pilgrimage to the town.
One of the petitioners, Muhammed Iqbal Ansari, said the verdict has been fair. “I accept the ruling,” he said. However a few from the minority community considered the disappointment rather bitter, saying the judgment betrayed the minorities.
